2014 Chevy Malibu 2.5 ecotec p0171 with freeze frame with very high LTFT
- SixOneFour
- Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
- Posts: 10
- Thank you received: 0
Hesistation
Somewhat rough idle but definitely not normal
Struggling acceleration especially re-acclerating after de-accelerating
What i have done already:
New MAF sensor
New intake and exhaust solenoids
New engine air filter
Oil Change with new oil filter
Have not tried smoke test to check for vaccum leak due to no smoke machine
Freeze Frame Data pulled from Torque App for android
Vehicle Manufacturer: Chevrolet
Vehicle Calibration ID: 126
Freeze frame information:
Fuel Status = 0 byte
Engine Load = 15.686 %
Engine Coolant Temperature = 172.4 °F
Fuel Trim Bank 1 Short Term = -1.562 %
Fuel Trim Bank 1 Long Term = 39.844 %
Fuel pressure = 43.511 psi
Intake Manifold Pressure = 3.916 psi
Engine RPM = 1,200.5 rpm
Speed (OBD) = 42.253 mph
Timing Advance = 42 °
Intake Air Temperature = 26.6 °F
Mass Air Flow Rate = 4.46 g/s
Throttle Position(Manifold) = 20.392 %
Fuel trim bank 1 sensor 1 = -1.562 %
Run time since engine start = 392 s
Fuel Rail Pressure = 688.929 psi
Fuel Level (From Engine ECU) = 50.196 %
Distance travelled since codes cleared = 264.083 miles
Evap System Vapour Pressure = -270.25 Pa
Barometric pressure (from vehicle) = 14.359 psi
Catalyst Temperature (Bank 1,Sensor 1) = 1,198.4 °F
Voltage (Control Module) = 15.251 V
Engine Load(Absolute) = 13.333 %
Commanded Equivalence Ratio(lambda) = 1
Relative Throttle Position = 10.196 %
Ambient air temp = 26.6 °F
Absolute Throttle Position B = 20.392 %
Accelerator PedalPosition D = 30.98 %
Accelerator PedalPosition E = 15.294 %
Any help would be appreciated!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
"Knowledge is a weapon. Arm yourself, well, before going to do battle."
"Understanding a question is half an answer."
I have learned more by being wrong, than I have by being right.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- SixOneFour
- Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
- Posts: 10
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- cheryl hartkorn
- Offline
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 692
- Thank you received: 130
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
I have a couple known good captures off a 2013 Malibu with the same 2.5L engine, for comparison. Have a look. Keep in mind that ShopStream Connect (the Snap-On desktop software) skipped a decimal point on the Fuel Pressure Sensor PID. It always shows in the hundreds. Add one decimal point to get the real value.
Idle:
www.scanshare.io/share/AAQFM8j4MEeEtG_aUaYtmA#0,34,35
Test drive:
www.scanshare.io/share/IHiHV2HovE60-zkRdMSyBw#0,20,21,34,35
It would appear that your fuel pressure reading of 43 PSI at idle isn't unreasonable. Monitor the same PID under load to make sure it's not dropping off. Monitor the rail pressure as well. It should be able to clear 1500 PSI easily under load. Most will do closer to 2000 PSI at WOT.
Definitely inspect the air intake tube as Cheryl suggested. Your MAF reading at 4.4 g/s is low for 1200 RPM.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- SixOneFour
- Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
- Posts: 10
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- SixOneFour
- Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
- Posts: 10
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- SixOneFour
- Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
- Posts: 10
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Good Loads and a lean upstream O2 would suggest a fuel quality issue, i.e. ethanol fuel in a non-Flex vehicle. Dunno if this Malibu is Flex Fuel, or if they sell E85 in your area. :silly:
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Desmond6004
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Getting involved in discussions because I have a lot to learn still.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Desmond6004 wrote: Control module voltage 15.251? Isn't that a little high?
Technically, yes? But it's a late model GM, and they'll charge at whatever rate the BCM feels like. :silly:
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Desmond6004
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Ok, like the Toyota I had the other day. Newley fitted driving lights kept blowing bulbs but headlights were fine.Tyler wrote:
Desmond6004 wrote: Control module voltage 15.251? Isn't that a little high?
Technically, yes? But it's a late model GM, and they'll charge at whatever rate the BCM feels like. :silly:
Code:https://www.remyautomotive.com/dam/jcr:5d7303a6-36a2-4ec8-9335-f1d81bce2d24/2)%20Technical%20Service%20Bulletin%20-%20June%202015.pdf
I checked charging at over 16 volts for a minute after start-up, dropping to 12.8 after 10 minutes. I scoped the headlight bulbs
and after start up they received pulse width modulation feed to compensate. The driving lights were connected directly
to the battery through a relay so the 16v was blowing the bulbs.
Getting involved in discussions because I have a lot to learn still.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- SixOneFour
- Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
- Posts: 10
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
SixOneFour wrote: I know the thing here is to not be a parts changer but I'd be lying if I said I'm not enjoying the knowledge I'm gaining from doing these things. Plus it's not breaking the bank, these are all fairly inexpensive parts.
No hate from me. As long as you're having a good time!
I'm pretty much down to manifold gasket and/or fuel injectors/pump (hopefully not pump) issues. But I'm strongly leaning towards manifold gasket which was my suspicion to begin with.
I doubt you're gonna find an intake issue, but I'm ready to be wrong. :silly: The fuel trims staying high while driving points more towards fuel delivery. You could always go for the classic ScannerDanner water test?
I'm not educated on TPS sensor, does anyone know if that can throw a p0171 code?
Unlikely. A dirty throttle body, maybe. But again, that won't matter when driving down the road (where the trims are still high).
I'll keep the updates coming because I don't see much of this engine with resolved problem codes on the internet so the people will get what they need from this post in the end.
Please do! I'm starting to see these cars roll in out of warranty, so this whole thread is valuable to me.
Have you tried watching the Loads and the upstream O2 during a WOT run? That'll allow you to check VE and fuel delivery, all in one test.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
If you find loose bolts, maybe try the water test beforehand? Just to see if it's a good way to find the problem. Then, snug 'em up and see what the trims do.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
If you find loose bolts, maybe try the water test beforehand? Just to see if it's a good way to find the problem. Then, snug 'em up and see what the trims do.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Tyler wrote: So did some more research on this one, and I may end up eating my words? Apparently it's very common for the intake bolts to come loose, and thus not seal against the cylinder head. :blink: Could be an easy fix if you put a ratchet on the bolts and they're loose!
If you find loose bolts, maybe try the water test beforehand? Just to see if it's a good way to find the problem. Then, snug 'em up and see what the trims do.
I’ve found that using an unlit propane torch works better when you are looking for intake leaks using fuel trim changes.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Sent from my Moto E (4) Plus using Tapatalk
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- SixOneFour
- Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
- Posts: 10
- Thank you received: 0
I will try this today. Most recent update now is that I've tried the water test around the tubes and around the intake, I did not hear any water being sucked in nor did I hear any idle change (which is already pretty rough) I did however notice for the first time that while my positive long term fuel trim was high my fuel trim went very negative about -15 to -20ish (rich?) while in park/idle and then it went back to doing what it normally does. I felt like the car wanted to stall for a second but it didn't.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- SixOneFour
- Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
- Posts: 10
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.