Help us help you. By posting the year, make, model and engine near the beginning of your help request, followed by the symptoms (no start, high idle, misfire etc.) Along with any prevalent Diagnostic Trouble Codes, aka DTCs, other forum members will be able to help you get to a solution more quickly and easily!

2001 Dodge Durango 4.7L

More
7 years 1 month ago #8735 by Kevace1
I have 2001 Dodge Durango 4x4 SLT, with the 4.7L vin code "J". One of the pistons blew on it. I was able to retrieve another short block for it. Changed the heads over, bought a complete new timing kit for it (Sprockets and chain), new spark plugs as well. Truck ran fine before the piston blowing. Heads had no damage. All is put together, car will crank, but not turn on. The crank sensor i believe is good, because if i manipulate it when its loose, it clicks on the fuel pump relay and others in the fuse box. Could it be that the reluctor inside the block is different then original? Is there another route i should go before i throw in the towel and get another motor? Any response would be greatly appreciated. Love your videos Also, BTW, im 120% sure it was put correctly and put in time. Before i put cover back on, i manually spun the motor and it falls back to all the appropriate marks. Also put a new head gasket and other new gaskets as well...
Let me know if there's another diag I may need to do for further clearing.....

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
7 years 1 month ago #8739 by Kevace1
Replied by Kevace1 on topic 2001 Dodge Durango 4.7L
Basically, one good question to know the answer to is does Chrysler use different reluctors for different 4.7 blocks? Because that reluctor is part of the block...

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
7 years 1 month ago #8741 by Tyler
Replied by Tyler on topic 2001 Dodge Durango 4.7L
Hey Kevace1! I'm not sure if there were different reluctors in use on these 4.7's, but we can check. Noah may have the answer to that one. ;)

Do you happen to know the year/make/model the donor short block came from? I know that Dodge/Chrysler/Jeep switched from their PCM designs from what was called JTEC to NGC in the early and mid 2000's. The crank and cam reluctor designs changed, too. :unsure: Check out this article from John Rogers on just such a case .

In the mean time, I'd suggest starting out with the basic checks for spark, injector pulse and fuel pressure. Knowing which one you're missing will help point us in the right direction. Here's a great ScannerDanner video for checking spark and injection pulse with an incandescent test light. It's on a Honda, but the basic concepts are the exact same.



Get back to us with what you find, and we can figure out the next step. ;)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
7 years 1 month ago - 7 years 1 month ago #8742 by Kevace1
Replied by Kevace1 on topic Re:2001 Dodge Durango 4.7L
Thanks Tyler for the info...spark will be my next check hopefully tomorrow if i get home early enough from work. But a note to add; im not sure where i got it from, im assuming from where i retrieved the short block from, i have a another crank sensor that is different then the one originally from my truck, and it plugs right in to the socket for my crank sensor, but it does not fit onto the block. Its held in by one bolt, and this different sensor was shorter compared to the original sensor... Maybe from the NGC PCM. IDK, but i know mine is a JTEC, i have 3 plugs on my PCM not 4 as in NGC.

BTW, read the article by John Roger's, really hope that didnt happen to me, but hoping the cam sensor design i mention is an indication of i have the right block. The link you mentioned about finding spark with incandescent test light didn't show =O



Sent from my 6045O using Tapatalk
Last edit: 7 years 1 month ago by Kevace1.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
7 years 1 month ago #8745 by Tyler
Replied by Tyler on topic Re:2001 Dodge Durango 4.7L

Kevace1 wrote: BTW, read the article by John Roger's, really hope that didnt happen to me, but hoping the cam sensor design i mention is an indication of i have the right block. The link you mentioned about finding spark with incandescent test light didn't show =O


It didn't? Crap... Maybe try this link:
Code:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6CMZ4g8n0FQ&feature=youtu.be

BTW, read the article by John Roger's, really hope that didnt happen to me, but hoping the cam sensor design i mention is an indication of i have the right block.


Yeah, sorry about that, I really didn't mean to worry you! :( I've been trying to think of a way to know for certain which tone wheel we're working with, JTEC or NGC. From what I'm reading, the NGC design has around 32 teeth on the crank wheel, while the JTEC has around 16. It'd be a lot of work, but you could pull the crank sensor, mark the tone wheel, and count the number of teeth in one full revolution. :huh:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
7 years 1 month ago #8748 by Kevace1
Replied by Kevace1 on topic Re:2001 Dodge Durango 4.7L
That little bit is very helpful. I will count the teeth on the old block and check and do the same to the new block. Thanks again tyler.....you did/are kinda scaring me.....but i guess i can only blame my own ignorance for this little misshap if it is the root cause, as i cant really find out where the donor motor came from

Sent from my 6045O using Tapatalk

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
7 years 1 month ago #8768 by Tyler
Replied by Tyler on topic Re:2001 Dodge Durango 4.7L

Kevace1 wrote: That little bit is very helpful. I will count the teeth on the old block and check and do the same to the new block. Thanks again tyler.....you did/are kinda scaring me.....but i guess i can only blame my own ignorance for this little misshap if it is the root cause, as i cant really find out where the donor motor came from

Sent from my 6045O using Tapatalk


No problem! As an alternative, if you have a DVOM, you could probe the CKP signal wire while turning the engine over and watch for how many 0-5V transitions you see. Mark the crank balancer for your 360 degree reference. Not sure if this would be less or more work, just an idea. ;)

I'm sorry, I'm not familiar enough with these engines to know the difference externally, or if there even is an external difference. :blink:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Noah
  • Noah's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Moderator
  • Moderator
  • Give code definitions with numbers!
More
7 years 4 weeks ago #8814 by Noah
Replied by Noah on topic 2001 Dodge Durango 4.7L
Looks like I'm late to the party, lol!
I don't understand how the reluctor is part of the block? I'm gonna have to look into this one a little further, I never noticed that feature of these motors.
As a rule of thumb, with ANY Chrysler motor swap, I use the flywheel off the engine that came out of the car.
They just make too many different ones across the board, and change them at irregular intervals (IE in the middle of a production year).
If there's a mismatched reluctor issue, it should show in live data. Cam and Crank sync pids during cranking should always say "Yes" or "Synched" or some sort of positive conformation.

"Ground cannot be checked with a 10mm socket"

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
7 years 4 weeks ago #8822 by Kevace1

Noah wrote: Looks like I'm late to the party, lol!
I don't understand how the reluctor is part of the block? I'm gonna have to look into this one a little further, I never noticed that feature of these motors.
As a rule of thumb, with ANY Chrysler motor swap, I use the flywheel off the engine that came out of the car.
They just make too many different ones across the board, and change them at irregular intervals (IE in the middle of a production year).
If there's a mismatched reluctor issue, it should show in live data. Cam and Crank sync pids during cranking should always say "Yes" or "Synched" or some sort of positive conformation.

Yes, in this motor, as with the 3.7 V6 in the liberty and other vehicles, the reluctor is inside is inside of the block. I dont have a scope tool, i have not gone that advanced yet in my garage tool repertoire, but i will soon. I just personally love messing with different cars period. Ive never been a dodge guy really. But got this durango in clean shape and as a trade. Ive already confirmed the old old block has 16 teeth at the reluctor like Tyler said.. Ill make sure i take pics of the of block for you noah. The car now is at a friends garage, cause wife needed the garage empty for a concrete treatment she wants to do...the flywheel has now say on turn on.

On a side note, my friend was sayimg he was spending some time on the truck for the heck of it...and he said he would get .5v on the crank sensor sensor wire with key on, but when he told his partner to crank, he loses it completely.... Never to see it again. Ill have to confirm thats the wire he's talking about...not sure if that helps any.....forgot what SD mentioned about the 3 wire crank sensor in Chrysler's

Sent from my 6045O using Tapatalk

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
7 years 4 weeks ago #8833 by Kevace1
Replied by Kevace1 on topic Re:2001 Dodge Durango 4.7L
Here is the reluctor of the old block. I guess chrysler thought it was a good idea......not sure why. Waiting for my buddy to let me know when he has time if the new block has the same amount of teeth.....ill keep you guys posted

Sent from my 6045O using Tapatalk

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
7 years 4 weeks ago #8837 by Tyler
Replied by Tyler on topic Re:2001 Dodge Durango 4.7L
Thanks for the update and pictures, sir! :cheer:

I'd be very interested to follow up on that signal disappearing once you get the truck back.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Noah
  • Noah's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Moderator
  • Moderator
  • Give code definitions with numbers!
More
7 years 3 weeks ago #8874 by Noah
Replied by Noah on topic Re:2001 Dodge Durango 4.7L
Oh, I see. The reluctor wheel is mounted on the crankshaft internal to the engine.
I couldn't quite picture how it could be integrated into the block casting.

"Ground cannot be checked with a 10mm socket"

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
7 years 3 weeks ago #8875 by Kevace1
Replied by Kevace1 on topic Re:2001 Dodge Durango 4.7L
Sorry for the long wait guys.....but it has been confirmed....im the eternal retard...the reluctor on the rebuilt block has 32 teeth....it will never crank.....now to figure out what route to go now.....i already put plenty of new parts on the new motor.....uuuuggghhhhh

Sent from my 6045O using Tapatalk

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Noah
  • Noah's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Moderator
  • Moderator
  • Give code definitions with numbers!
More
7 years 3 weeks ago #8878 by Noah
Replied by Noah on topic Re:2001 Dodge Durango 4.7L

Kevace1 wrote: Sorry for the long wait guys.....but it has been confirmed....im the eternal retard...the reluctor on the rebuilt block has 32 teeth....it will never crank.....now to figure out what route to go now.....i already put plenty of new parts on the new motor.....uuuuggghhhhh

Sent from my 6045O using Tapatalk

Don't be too hard on yourself!
Interchanging Chrysler engines can be tricky business! I've seen plenty of traps sprung three quarters of the way through an engine swap.

So, there's really only one solution to this problem, right? Change the engine again...
Or am I overlooking another simpler solution?

"Ground cannot be checked with a 10mm socket"

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
7 years 3 weeks ago #8880 by Kevace1

Noah wrote:

Kevace1 wrote: Sorry for the long wait guys.....but it has been confirmed....im the eternal retard...the reluctor on the rebuilt block has 32 teeth....it will never crank.....now to figure out what route to go now.....i already put plenty of new parts on the new motor.....uuuuggghhhhh

Sent from my 6045O using Tapatalk

Don't be too hard on yourself!
Interchanging Chrysler engines can be tricky business! I've seen plenty of traps sprung three quarters of the way through an engine swap.

So, there's really only one solution to this problem, right? Change the engine again...
Or am I overlooking another simpler solution?

That kinda rolled off the tongue pretty easily..... :p :p :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

I have already spent over $300 in parts for this motor already. Im internally debating just fixing the broken piston on the old block, the other option is another motor all together, but then what do i do with this one?? IDK.....im having a huge internal debate :( :confused:

Sent from my 6045O using Tapatalk

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Noah
  • Noah's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Moderator
  • Moderator
  • Give code definitions with numbers!
More
7 years 3 weeks ago #8882 by Noah
Is there any way you can get an exchange or refund on the engine?
Technically, it is the wrong engine...

"Ground cannot be checked with a 10mm socket"

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
7 years 3 weeks ago - 7 years 3 weeks ago #8885 by Kevace1
Replied by Kevace1 on topic Re:2001 Dodge Durango 4.7L
That unfortunately is not an option....the rebuilt motor came with the truck...and i got it back in February... Now the guy wont answer any text.....but im not too angry...i traded him a 96 dakota ext cab with a bad tranny...just hate that I didn't know this little detail before putting the motor all together with new parts....im assuming just changing the computer probably wont be an avenue to go???

Sent from my 6045O using Tapatalk
Last edit: 7 years 3 weeks ago by Kevace1.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
7 years 3 weeks ago #8886 by ceasarmobile
cked ur basics fuel spark different shortblck after 2003 it has a different reluctor if timing rwong one tooth will not run

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
7 years 3 weeks ago #8887 by Kevace1

cesar.hernandez wrote: cked ur basics fuel spark different shortblck after 2003 it has a different reluctor if timing rwong one tooth will not run

Read a few posts back my friend.....i have a whole different issue now

Sent from my 6045O using Tapatalk

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
7 years 3 weeks ago #8888 by ceasarmobile
take cramk out exchange reluctors

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.285 seconds