*** Restricting New Posts to SD Premium Members ONLY *** (09 May 2025)

Just made a new account? Can't post? Click above.

Help us help you. By posting the year, make, model and engine near the beginning of your help request, followed by the symptoms (no start, high idle, misfire etc.) Along with any prevalent Diagnostic Trouble Codes, aka DTCs, other forum members will be able to help you get to a solution more quickly and easily!

2009 Lexus GS460 4.6L -- P0171 - P1170

  • TheMillenialMechanic
  • TheMillenialMechanic's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • New Member
  • New Member
More
3 years 4 months ago #56512 by TheMillenialMechanic
2009 Lexus GS460 4.6L -- P0171 - P1170 was created by TheMillenialMechanic
Hey all, I have an 09 Lexus GS460 in with a P0171 and P1170. Mostly focusing on the P0171 as of right now, I have a strong feeling it's causing the 1170. Might be wrong. I'm not sure, that's why I'm here. Started out by driving the car, car drives really good, has a slight stumble at idle, but nothing major. Pulled up fuel trims on my Modis and found Bank 1 STFT to be +20 and long terms to be about +15. Revving the engine, and driving the car under load didn't do much to change those numbers, but they did fluctuate back down to normal and then sometimes to around -10. Didn't seem to be anything super consistent with it. Bank 2 that's not setting a code has LTFT at a -2% (ish) but the STFT hangs around -10. I started off by watching my MAF g/s and calculated load, and on a snap throttle, the MAF goes up to 170 g/s and the calculated load goes to 97%. Not worried about either MAF at this time. What I did notice is that this car uses wideband O2s on the upstream. After consulting service information, and gathering the needed description and operation, I found that these sensors when running properly typically hang around 3.3 volts, and that they switch opposite to conventional O2's with 3.4+ being lean, and 3.2- being rich. So I added those PIDs to by data list, and found that the B1 sensor reads a steady 3.5, and B2 reads about 3.2. During driving, I noticed that when I gave her the beans so to speak, both sensors dropped down below 3 volts indicating that they were reading the enrichment, but the B1 didn't drop anywhere near as low as B2. Infact, it was quite rare for B1 to go below 3 volts at all. I also noticed that on decel, both sensors peg at 5v, I assume because the computer is cutting injector pulse, and that would indicate a normal condition in my opinion. Again, maybe I'm wrong. I'm not sure. I did find the A/F sensor to be oil contaminated (not severely but still) from a leaking valve cover. So at this point, I had decided that it would be best to start by replacing the B1 A/F sensor. However when I went into Mitchells estimate guide, it said that the job pays 17.7 hours because the engine and transmission have to be removed. This made me nervous, so I decided to take some things apart and perform some visual inspections on the motor. I removed the B1 air filter and intake boot, and inspected for cracks. None found, however there was a small amount of oil in the boot and throttle body. I also pulled the MAF to check for any contamination on the resistors and found none. I reassembled, and decided I wanted to drive the car again, so I pulled up my data stream and alas.. The STFT on B1 is now in the negatives correcting as if a problem has been solved. This was the end of my initial hour of diag, as well as the end of my day, so I decided to let the vehicle cool down, and I want to see what the trims look like in the morning. I still would appreciate any guidance that anyone has as this is my first time ever dealing with A/F sensors. My fear is obviously misdiagnosing the vehicle with such an expensive problem, and wasting my clients money. I do know that Identifix has a few hits for these sensors causing the P0171, but I'm always weary of anything I see on there.

Thank you for taking your time to help! It is always appreciated.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.220 seconds