1998 Oldsmobile 88 3800 series 2 slight stumble at idle and high LTFT
The issue I am having is I have a very slight stumble at idle. No codes, and I am ruling out the IAC due to it being fairly new and the pintle responds well with KOEO and retracts just the same. I notice that at idle my LTFT is sometimes as high as 13% at idle with closed loop just starting, but after driving around a while it evens out at around 6-8% at idle. My STFT numbers are always hovering 0% so no problem there.
At idle when I snap the throttle or slightly depress it, I see the LTFT numbers drop. I know this is a classic vacuum leak issue, but I'm not sure that is the only contributor to my issue. I have smoke tested the intake many times. I've fixed all the vacuum leaks, except I discovered I have a leak in the crankcase. On this engine, the side of the block that bolts to the transmission has a cover similar to a timing chain cover. I suspect the gasket on that cover has gone bad because I get smoke in the bell housing of the transmission/engine block. I know this theoretically will contribute to a lean condition due to the PCV system getting unmetered air, but I'm not sure how much this would contribute to my issue since the PCV valve is a fixed vacuum leak. I do acknowledge the leaky gasket is a problem, but as it is I cannot repair this. I did a ton of work to this car and just got it aligned after front end suspension rebuild, and did a lot of internal transmission repairs. Separating the engine from the trans to repair that gasket is just not something I plan to do as of right now.
I can live with the LTFT as it is and accept that the repair is too great for me to want to deal with at hte moment, but I am wondering if my stumble at idle may be a separate issue. I've tested o2 sensors and there is no fixed rich or lean condition, and the sensors respond appropriately to a propane test.
I wanted to get a second opinion on my MAF data though. At longer sample rates, it seems my square wave is not consistent, and the stumbles are consistent with the longer PWM pulses I see on the scope. Due to my scope being a cheaper chinese scope and not specific to automotive testing, I cannot graph frequency, but I still feel like the MAF may be bad based on the scope data. When I say the car stumbles at idle, I am talking very slightly. It idles at a fixed rpm +/- 100 or so, and it drives fine. But the stumble is there, and the drop outs in the MAF signal correspond to the stumble as stated.
Any help is greatly appreciated.
<div style="width:100%;height:0px;position:relative;padding-bottom:178.218%;"><i-frame src=" streamable.com/e/oj5tzb " frameborder="0" width="100%" height="100%" allowfullscreen style="width:100%;height:100%;position:absolute;left:0px;top:0px;overflow:hidden;">
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
olds88 wrote: I wanted to get a second opinion on my MAF data though. At longer sample rates, it seems my square wave is not consistent, and the stumbles are consistent with the longer PWM pulses I see on the scope.
I am not familiar with that scope, or it's capabilities. Aliasing happens when a scope's sample rate is not fast enough for the signal. This can make a signal look like it has dropouts or glitches, when it actually doesn't. That being said, that doesn't look like a good signal, to me.
"Knowledge is a weapon. Arm yourself, well, before going to do battle."
"Understanding a question is half an answer."
I have learned more by being wrong, than I have by being right.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Might also catch it graphing MAF PID by itself. The MX+ is kinda slow on early GMs but it might show the longer dropouts, which look to be ~1 second long.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
My MAF seems to be doing the opposite where the drop out is on the lower frequencies, but my meters definitely don't catch it. I was only able to see it even on the scope when I set the sampling rate to 2s or more. I wouldn't doubt a Fluke could pick it up though. Definitely on the list of want items.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
olds88 wrote: My MAF seems to be doing the opposite where the drop out is on the lower frequencies, but my meters definitely don't catch it. I was only able to see it even on the scope when I set the sampling rate to 2s or more. I wouldn't doubt a Fluke could pick it up though. Definitely on the list of want items.
A decent Fluke would pick it up if it was really happening. And the fact neither of your DMMs would makes me question your 'scope. Some of those dropouts were long enough any half decent DMM should show a dip in frequency.
And FWIW if all you're doing is automotive you'd be better putting the money into a better 'scope than a Fluke.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.