*** Restricting New Posts to SD Premium Members ONLY *** (09 May 2025)
Just made a new account? Can't post? Click above.
misfire cylnder #5
- A93320336@gmail.com
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 56
- Thank you received: 0
gmc sierra 1500 2014 5.4 with 319k km
custmer compline missfire on #5
i sweep coil,plug and plug wire still same
control is ok
i do relative test with trigger on #5 (green))
i see #5 is higher than other
is this cuse misfire
still am not play with injector or it is ramp
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Tyler
-
- Offline
- Moderator
-
- Full time HACK since 2012
- Posts: 6039
- Thank you received: 1518
Go in-cylinder on #5 if possible. If not, do a running compression test on #5 and another known good cylinder for comparison. I'm betting running compression on #5 will be low.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Chad
-
- Offline
- Moderator
-
- I am not a parts changer.
- Posts: 2115
- Thank you received: 707
i do relative test with trigger on #5 (green))
Is your Relative Compression done with Voltage, or Current?
i see #5 is higher than other
is this cuse misfire
Having higher current on one cylinder indicates MORE work on the Starter. Are you sure the misfire is on Cylinder #5? If the companion cylinder is coming up on the exhaust stroke, but the exhaust valve does not open, you will have TWO compression strokes, simultaneously, increasing the load on the starter.
Tyler wrote: I'm betting running compression on #5 will be low.
Did you notice that the .jpg is upside down? I'm curious if this is a Current Waveform, or Voltage waveform. If this is a Current Waveform, Compression on Cylinder 5 is HIGH, or companion cylinder exhaust valve failed.
Is it upside down, on purpose, to invert a voltage image? In that case, #5 would have Low Compression.
"Knowledge is a weapon. Arm yourself, well, before going to do battle."
"Understanding a question is half an answer."
I have learned more by being wrong, than I have by being right.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- guafa
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 477
- Thank you received: 80
Is that trigger on time?
I am seing that pulse advanced (or delayed depending on voltage or current waveform).
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Hardtopdr2
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 849
- Thank you received: 148
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Tyler
-
- Offline
- Moderator
-
- Full time HACK since 2012
- Posts: 6039
- Thank you received: 1518
Tyler wrote: Did you notice that the .jpg is upside down? I'm curious if this is a Current Waveform, or Voltage waveform. If this is a Current Waveform, Compression on Cylinder 5 is HIGH, or companion cylinder exhaust valve failed.
Is it upside down, on purpose, to invert a voltage image? In that case, #5 would have Low Compression.
I did notice that! I was struggling to make out the traces until I flipped the image:
That made it easier to see that the red trace is on a 200A scale. Sure, it still could be some kind of battery voltage trace, but the appearance of the waveform really said amp probe to me.
It sounds wacky, but I've seen wiped intake lobes on these engines cause higher cranking compression, but lower running compression. :silly: For example, a known good cylinder:
Then the bad:
I didn't expect this one to bury my 200 PSI scale. :blush: An added 30 PSI compression can certainly make an RC hump noticeably taller.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Chad
-
- Offline
- Moderator
-
- I am not a parts changer.
- Posts: 2115
- Thank you received: 707
Tyler wrote: It sounds wacky, but I've seen wiped intake lobes on these engines cause higher cranking compression, but lower running compression. :silly:
:huh: I'm gonna have to chew on that one, for awhile. :ohmy:
"Knowledge is a weapon. Arm yourself, well, before going to do battle."
"Understanding a question is half an answer."
I have learned more by being wrong, than I have by being right.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Tyler
-
- Offline
- Moderator
-
- Full time HACK since 2012
- Posts: 6039
- Thank you received: 1518
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- A93320336@gmail.com
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 56
- Thank you received: 0
i have no in-cylinder
but i will do compration test
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- A93320336@gmail.com
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 56
- Thank you received: 0
now the misfire on #5 and #1
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Matt T
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 751
- Thank you received: 276
Tyler wrote:
Chad wrote: :huh: I'm gonna have to chew on that one, for awhile. :ohmy:
It still kinda hurts my head when I think about it too much. :lol:
It looks like the wiped lobe is causing the intake valve to open late and close early. Here is the valve timing for a 2.5 Jeep engine for reference. There's some overlap when the intake valve opens and the exhaust closes. The intake valve closes after BDC which'll dump the start of the compression stroke back into the intake.
The vacuum event after 360* has to be caused by the piston moving down with both valves closed. When the intake valve opens in cylinder pressure rises to normal so the valve is opening enough to get a full charge of air at cranking rpm. Compression stroke appears to be starting early due to the intake valve closing too soon. This would probably all look a lot clearer with degree markers on the trace.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Tyler
-
- Offline
- Moderator
-
- Full time HACK since 2012
- Posts: 6039
- Thank you received: 1518
tested #5 #2 #3 is near 180 psi #1 is near 150
now the misfire on #5 and #1
Did you happen to do running compression, too? 'Cause those numbers are way too high to be running. :lol:
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Chad
-
- Offline
- Moderator
-
- I am not a parts changer.
- Posts: 2115
- Thank you received: 707


"Knowledge is a weapon. Arm yourself, well, before going to do battle."
"Understanding a question is half an answer."
I have learned more by being wrong, than I have by being right.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Tyler
-
- Offline
- Moderator
-
- Full time HACK since 2012
- Posts: 6039
- Thank you received: 1518
Matt T wrote: It looks like the wiped lobe is causing the intake valve to open late and close early.
I think that's exactly what was happening.

Sorry, I should have put degree markers on the original post. I was just lazy. :blush: Here we go:
Really didn't mean to threadjack.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.