2004 Honda lean condition
- jrainey1981
- Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
- Posts: 5
- Thank you received: 0
Some questions:
My short term fuel trim on both banks never approach 0 and generally stay at about what the long term trim is at. Also, the EQ stays around 1.0. Shouldn't the EQ be above 1.0 due to the lean condition? Is this an indication of a faulty or dirty sensor?
As seen in the data below it looks like the downstream o2 sensors control fuel trim. Am I correct? The upstream sensors are labeled as "air/fuel ratio" sensors when I look up the part numbers and the downstream seem to be standard o2 sensors.
I did view the data at open throttle and it seemed like the sensors went rich then lean upon deceleration and the short term fuel trim good down slightly but not significantly. Lastly, I am not experiencing any noticeable lack of power or idle issues. Thank you for any information you can provide.
Respectfully,
Stumped
C_CNT - 0
FUELSYS1 - CL
FUEL SYS2 - CL
LOAD_PCT(%) - 26.3
ETC(F) - 181
SHRTFT1(%) - 21.9
LONGFT1(%) - 19.3
SHORTFT2(%) - 16.4
LONGFT2(%) - 10.2
MAP(IN/HG) - 7.7
RPM(/MIN) - 658
SPARKADV - 10
IAT(F) - 129
TP(%) - 13.7
O2S - B1S12--B1S12--
O2B1S2(V) - 0.400
SHRTFTB1S2(%) - 24.2
O2B2S2(V) - 0.670
SHRTFTB2S2(%) - 14.3
EQ_RAT11 - 1.002
O2S11(mA) - 0.031
EQ_RAT21 - 1.002
O2S21(mA) - 0.000
TP_R(%) - 2.4
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
jrainey1981 wrote: My short term fuel trim on both banks never approach 0 and generally stay at about what the long term trim is at. Also, the EQ stays around 1.0. Shouldn't the EQ be above 1.0 due to the lean condition? Is this an indication of a faulty or dirty sensor?
Equivalence Ratio staying at around 1.0 is a good sign, as this indicates a stoichiometric mixture. The upstream air/fuel ratio sensor readings of nearly 0mA confirm this.
If your lean condition was on one bank only, I'd say maybe you have a bad upstream sensor? But you're lean on both banks, so I'd say we need to search for something common to both banks.
As seen in the data below it looks like the downstream o2 sensors control fuel trim. Am I correct? The upstream sensors are labeled as "air/fuel ratio" sensors when I look up the part numbers and the downstream seem to be standard o2 sensors.
You're looking at these PIDs, right?
I'm not positive about your Japanese market vehicle, but in the US market, these PIDs are misleading at best. Usually they're flat out wrong. :lol: I wouldn't place any value on those PIDs at the moment.
The downstream sensors definitely do have SOME fuel trim control, but it's not my initial first thought. If you want to be certain, you can try disconnecting both downstream sensors and rechecking your trims.
I did view the data at open throttle and it seemed like the sensors went rich then lean upon deceleration...
I take this to be an initial good sign for the fuel delivery and air/fuel ratio sensors.
...and the short term fuel trim good down slightly but not significantly. Lastly, I am not experiencing any noticeable lack of power or idle issues. Thank you for any information you can provide.
Also an initial good sign for the fuel delivery system, IMO.
They don't sell the Inspire in the US, unfortunately. I need you to let us know if this car has a MAF sensor or not. It makes a difference in our list of suspects, and the next easiest test to do.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- jrainey1981
- Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
- Posts: 5
- Thank you received: 0
I will definitely try disconnecting the o2 sensors and reporting the difference.
The other thing that is making the diagnosis more difficult is that the short term fuel trim never goes towards zero...
Thanks again!
The car has a MAP sensor only and sits on the throttle body just after the plate.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Kidding! I'm just not big on football. Maybe I'd watch if the Chiefs made it?
Thanks for confirming the lack of a MAF. Truthfully, having one would have made this diag easier. :silly: The speed density Honda systems very rarely run lean, in my experience.
While you're rechecking data after disconnecting the O2's? Have a look at the MAP PID with the key on but engine off. That'll be the barometric pressure reading, and (should be) equivalent to your altitude above sea level. Mostly checking to see if the MAP is reporting correctly.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- jrainey1981
- Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
- Posts: 5
- Thank you received: 0
I disconnected b2s2 and the short term fuel trim stayed at zero. Got a check engine light and the smell of gas was overwhelming so I shut off the car. Only ran the car for about 1 minute but bank 1 short term fuel trim was already at 9.3. Spark advance was at -7degrees of that helps...
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- juergen.scholl
- Offline
- Platinum Member
- Active partschanger
- Posts: 1195
- Thank you received: 446
Do you have data on other than idling condition? What happens at higher rpm and/or at full load?
How about fuel volume and pressure?
It might be something simple like dirty injectors or fuel filter. Not sure wether your car features an in -line filter....if i does not then the in-tank strainer might be clogged.Could you take an amp reading of the fuel pump?
An expert is someone who knows each time more on each time less, until he finally knows absolutely everything about absolutely nothing.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Desmond6004
- Offline
- Platinum Member
I checked live data in mine the other day and the front oxygen sensor controls fuel trims full time while the rear sensor occasionally makes an adjustment, I imagine if the CAT can't keep up???.
I have seen mention of the "rear sensor takes over if the front sensor fails" but don't know much more on the subject.
Getting involved in discussions because I have a lot to learn still.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- jrainey1981
- Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
- Posts: 5
- Thank you received: 0
I have attached the document to process the information a little easier
@Desmond6004 I also believed that was how the O2 sensors worked here too but when I saw the scan tool data I started to question myself. I don't know too much on the subject either...
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Bank one is stubbornly lean! :lol: Bank two gets somewhat better off idle, but not better enough. I'm with Juergen about a possible fuel pressure or clogged injector problem.
Proving it will be difficult without changing parts. If your fuel pressure is good, then you'd need an injector balance tester to find which injectors are flowing less than the others. You'd also have to remove the upper intake to get to the injectors on this engine. It's not hard to do, just inconvenient. :silly:
EDIT: Here's an example of an injector balance test, if you haven't seen it already:
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- jrainey1981
- Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
- Posts: 5
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.