Help us help you. By posting the year, make, model and engine near the beginning of your help request, followed by the symptoms (no start, high idle, misfire etc.) Along with any prevalent Diagnostic Trouble Codes, aka DTCs, other forum members will be able to help you get to a solution more quickly and easily!
restricted intercooler observations
- fj5gtx
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 16
- Thank you received: 2
1 week 1 day ago #93276
by fj5gtx
restricted intercooler observations was created by fj5gtx
2014 Chevrolet Cruze Eco 1.4 Turbo
After having a PCV mishap, replaced the valve cover and intake manifold with new OEM parts. After the replacement, the crankcase seemed to have a little too much vacuum - probably 4 psi. So I swapped on a Dorman valve cover and checked that the boost check valve was still in the intake. Same result - higher than expected crankcase vacuum.
Cooling fan needed to be replaced as the resistor was fried and the fan wouldn't run at any speed. The bumper needs to come off to do that job, making it easy to inspect the intercooler input/output pipe connections. Could tell that some oil had gotten into the intercooler and leaked past the o-rings and leaving some residual oil around the connection. Removed and cleaned the connection on the output side, will conduct a pressure test to see if the seals are leaking at 15-20psi.
The MAF sensor had been showing about 1.8 g/s at warm idle, and the car has poor idle with the AC compressor clutch energized.
Hypothesis: The intercooler isn't free flowing enough and causing the engine to pull a higher than designed vacuum through the PCV system. Test: Pull the intake pipe off the throttle body and check to see if the crankcase pressure decreases to normal <18 inches of water.
Does the hypothesis/test sound plausible?
After having a PCV mishap, replaced the valve cover and intake manifold with new OEM parts. After the replacement, the crankcase seemed to have a little too much vacuum - probably 4 psi. So I swapped on a Dorman valve cover and checked that the boost check valve was still in the intake. Same result - higher than expected crankcase vacuum.
Cooling fan needed to be replaced as the resistor was fried and the fan wouldn't run at any speed. The bumper needs to come off to do that job, making it easy to inspect the intercooler input/output pipe connections. Could tell that some oil had gotten into the intercooler and leaked past the o-rings and leaving some residual oil around the connection. Removed and cleaned the connection on the output side, will conduct a pressure test to see if the seals are leaking at 15-20psi.
The MAF sensor had been showing about 1.8 g/s at warm idle, and the car has poor idle with the AC compressor clutch energized.
Hypothesis: The intercooler isn't free flowing enough and causing the engine to pull a higher than designed vacuum through the PCV system. Test: Pull the intake pipe off the throttle body and check to see if the crankcase pressure decreases to normal <18 inches of water.
Does the hypothesis/test sound plausible?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Tyler
-
- Offline
- Moderator
-
- Full time HACK since 2012
Less
More
- Posts: 6145
- Thank you received: 1550
6 days 1 hour ago #93285
by Tyler
Honestly? No, I don't think so. But I'm wrong all the time! I'd be genuinely interested to see how this goes if you do the test.
For me, your charge air cooler has to be severely restricted in order to cause an increase in intake vacuum and impact PCV function. Restricted, like, the car won't make it out of the parking spot. Completely caved in. I've seen those charge air coolers leak a few times, but never restrict.
Plus, your MAF reading of 1.8 g/s sounds entirely reasonable for this engine. You can also compare the MAF rate with the Calculated Air Flow for reference. They should agree within .5 g/s.
Another test would be to monitor Absolute Load and the boost pressure sensor during a WOT run through 2nd gear. Healthy LUV/LUJ engines will clear 175% Absolute Load. A restricted cooler would lead to low Absolute Load and low boost (or vacuum) at the boost pressure sensor.
Replied by Tyler on topic restricted intercooler observations
Does the hypothesis/test sound plausible?
Honestly? No, I don't think so. But I'm wrong all the time! I'd be genuinely interested to see how this goes if you do the test.
For me, your charge air cooler has to be severely restricted in order to cause an increase in intake vacuum and impact PCV function. Restricted, like, the car won't make it out of the parking spot. Completely caved in. I've seen those charge air coolers leak a few times, but never restrict.
Plus, your MAF reading of 1.8 g/s sounds entirely reasonable for this engine. You can also compare the MAF rate with the Calculated Air Flow for reference. They should agree within .5 g/s.
Another test would be to monitor Absolute Load and the boost pressure sensor during a WOT run through 2nd gear. Healthy LUV/LUJ engines will clear 175% Absolute Load. A restricted cooler would lead to low Absolute Load and low boost (or vacuum) at the boost pressure sensor.
The following user(s) said Thank You: fj5gtx
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Tyler
-
- Offline
- Moderator
-
- Full time HACK since 2012
Less
More
- Posts: 6145
- Thank you received: 1550
6 days 1 hour ago #93286
by Tyler
Replied by Tyler on topic restricted intercooler observations
The following user(s) said Thank You: fj5gtx
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.391 seconds