*** Restricting New Posts to SD Premium Members ONLY *** (09 May 2025)
Just made a new account? Can't post? Click above.
P0172 2000 Toyota Sienna
- riqs67
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
-
- Posts: 7
- Thank you received: 2
i have owned this Sienna for 11 trouble free years then came the P0172 :Initially no codes set but lost power up a hill like the transmission was done :After a restart drove ok then eventually became undriveable : Parts cannon started with a new MAF but no change : went to a mechanic and they told me it was an 02 sensor (not AF sensor so that may still be an issue )Bank one / that did not fix it as the code came back
they said it was an injector on bank 1 : I ordered 6 refurbished Denso’s and they changed the plugs , wires , fuel filter and PCV. This did not fix it and they gave up / I bought a scan tool to try and sort this out myself now
I pulled one of the plugs on bank 2 and it was dark like it was running rich : the exhaust smells rich have a known good MaF / cleaned the IAC and the throttle body / vacuum is around 18 on the gauge
i am about to test for the fuel pressure as it did not look like the mechanic did : the fuel pressure regulator is with the fuel pump in the tank and I believe this is a returnless system with the excess fuel staying in the tank ?
if the fuel gauge shows normal pressure, where else should I look?
Thanks , Rick (Vancouver BC
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Tyler
-
- Offline
- Moderator
-
- Full time HACK since 2012
- Posts: 6043
- Thank you received: 1519
Fuel pressure is a suspect, but kinda difficult to check on this engine due to the lack of a test port. The fuel pressure would also have to be extremely high to account for trims this negative. I'd suggest checking some easier suspects first.
I know you replaced the MAF, but I'd still suggest checking its readings anyway. At hot idle with no loads on, we generally expect the MAF rate in g/s to equal engine displacement. In this case, 3.0 g/s.
I'd also suggest watching the O2 signal and trims while the engine is warming up from a cold start. I see you've got a capture from an Autel, but again, I'd suggest doing your own oxygen sensor testing. With the engine at a hot idle, create a large vacuum leak and make sure all three O2 respond quickly. Add brake cleaner to the same vacuum leak and look again.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- riqs67
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
-
- Posts: 7
- Thank you received: 2
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- riqs67
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
-
- Posts: 7
- Thank you received: 2
MAF is between 5-8 on startup then settles down to between 3 and 4
O2/AF sensors don’t seem to react to rich conditions or lean when I tried they stayed maxed out in the .95 .97 range
I wonder now if all the injectors I replaced are bad : I did not see the data when it first happend to know if both banks were rich or just one when they said to change an injector on bank 1
I pulled and cleaned the bank 2 a/f and it looked ok better than the spark plugs that are black :
The only way I get negative on the voltage /o2 sensor is right after I blip the throttle and the engine gets more air
Bank 2 sensor 1 still moves slow but in the same direction as the other 2
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Lupe
-
- Offline
- Premium Member
-
- Posts: 129
- Thank you received: 22
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- juergen.scholl
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Active partschanger
- Posts: 1230
- Thank you received: 462
Are you positive the injectors are the correct ones or may they have a different flow rate?
An expert is someone who knows each time more on each time less, until he finally knows absolutely everything about absolutely nothing.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- riqs67
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
-
- Posts: 7
- Thank you received: 2
That’s a great question and I was told the injectors were correct but didn’t it test them to verify nor did the mechanic
I will have to go back to that as my last resort : I have the old fuel injectors and would rebuild those before putting them back in
The evap purge seems to be operating correctly: I have identified an out of range throttle position sensor and will change that when the part arrives to see if I get it resolved
My temps are in Celsius so that may be confusing
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- riqs67
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
-
- Posts: 7
- Thank you received: 2
Throttle position sensor was replaced and the range is slightly better but not what i had expected
It’s max is now 52% better than in the 40’s but no where near the 72% that I believe it should be
I created a vacuum leak after the MAf and no change in short term trims they stayed -20 but the idle increased tried a Vacuum leak before the MAF and the same results stayed at -20 : the only way they go positive is after pressing the accelerator quickly
am looking to get my old injectors rebuilt/ tested and last resort is changing them Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- riqs67
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
-
- Posts: 7
- Thank you received: 2
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- riqs67
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
-
- Posts: 7
- Thank you received: 2
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Noah
-
- Offline
- Moderator
-
- Give code definitions with numbers!
- Posts: 4923
- Thank you received: 1099
"Ground cannot be checked with a 10mm socket"
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- juergen.scholl
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Active partschanger
- Posts: 1230
- Thank you received: 462
Good news, thanks for posting a follow up with the fix
+1
An expert is someone who knows each time more on each time less, until he finally knows absolutely everything about absolutely nothing.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.