A place to discuss hardware/software and diagnostic procedures
Re:Re:Primary vs secondary ignition confusion
- Mitchroberson
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Senior Member
Less
More
- Posts: 74
- Thank you received: 12
2 years 6 months ago #51594
by Mitchroberson
Primary vs secondary ignition confusion was created by Mitchroberson
Ok this may sound dumb. But I have a ne oscilloscope. Been a dream since I was in high school automotive to learn how to use one.
So I thought I watched a video. That someone stated you needed an attenuator for when you measure primary ignition. But I thought it was the secondary side that had all the high voltage. And primary generally had just 12 volts?
Did I misunderstand what was said?
Sent from my SM-N970U using Tapatalk
So I thought I watched a video. That someone stated you needed an attenuator for when you measure primary ignition. But I thought it was the secondary side that had all the high voltage. And primary generally had just 12 volts?
Did I misunderstand what was said?
Sent from my SM-N970U using Tapatalk
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
2 years 6 months ago #51595
by Ben
Replied by Ben on topic Re:Primary vs secondary ignition confusion
The reason you need an attenuator for primary is you are directly touching the wire that had the voltage and as it is being fed by 12v the coils flyback voltage (what isn't used on the secondary side) comes back on the primary side (several hundred volts). Onto the secondary side it is thousands of volts and i doubt an attenuator could save your scope if it was connected to a secondary side of a coil (like inserting a probe into the end of the wire) which is why we use cop paddles or inductive wire clamps were not actually touching any voltage were just reading the magnetic field voltage created by such high voltage. Hope that helps if not im sure someone can explain it better!
Sent from my SM-G781U using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-G781U using Tapatalk
The following user(s) said Thank You: Chad, Mitchroberson
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Mitchroberson
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Senior Member
Less
More
- Posts: 74
- Thank you received: 12
2 years 6 months ago #51599
by Mitchroberson
Replied by Mitchroberson on topic Re:Primary vs secondary ignition confusion
Thanks, it confirmed what I thought would happen but was not 100% sure.
Sent from my SM-N970U using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-N970U using Tapatalk
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
2 years 6 months ago - 2 years 6 months ago #51601
by Chad
An ignition coil is a step-up transformer. It converts low voltage and high current, from the primary side, into high voltage and low current on the secondary side.
Electrical voltage can be created many ways. One way is with a coil of wire, a magnet, and motion. An ignition coil has a primary, and a secondary coil of wire. When the primary coil is energized with 12v, it creates a magnetic field, which surrounds both Primary and secondary coils.
So, we have two conductors, and a magnet. When we de-energize the coil, the magnetic field collapses. This collapse of the magnetic field is the motion. Voltage is created. How much voltage is created depends on the conductor (Coil of wire), the strength of the magnet, and the speed of the motion. Due to the number of windings in the Primary Coil, Around 400 volts is created on the Primary side during the collapse of the magnetic field. But remember, the Ignition coil has TWO Coils. The Secondary winding, also, uses the magnetic field created, and collapsed, by the primary coil. The Secondary has 100x the amount of windings as the Primary, so the voltage created in the Secondary is 100x that of the primary. 400v x 100 = 40,000v.
As Ben pointed out, when we read Primary Voltage, Your Scope lead is physically touching the circuit, and is in direct contact with 400v. When we read secondary, we are reading a magnetic field created around the wire, the scope lead is not physically touching the circuit. Secondary Ignition probes convert the magnetic field into a LOW voltage that can be measured by the scope and translated to represent the HIGH voltage.
"Knowledge is a weapon. Arm yourself, well, before going to do battle."
"Understanding a question is half an answer."
I have learned more by being wrong, than I have by being right.
Replied by Chad on topic Re:Primary vs secondary ignition confusion
Disclaimer: This is a layman's understanding and explanation. I welcome any corrections, or additional input.as it is being fed by 12v the coils flyback voltage (what isn't used on the secondary side) comes back on the primary side (several hundred volts).
An ignition coil is a step-up transformer. It converts low voltage and high current, from the primary side, into high voltage and low current on the secondary side.
Electrical voltage can be created many ways. One way is with a coil of wire, a magnet, and motion. An ignition coil has a primary, and a secondary coil of wire. When the primary coil is energized with 12v, it creates a magnetic field, which surrounds both Primary and secondary coils.
So, we have two conductors, and a magnet. When we de-energize the coil, the magnetic field collapses. This collapse of the magnetic field is the motion. Voltage is created. How much voltage is created depends on the conductor (Coil of wire), the strength of the magnet, and the speed of the motion. Due to the number of windings in the Primary Coil, Around 400 volts is created on the Primary side during the collapse of the magnetic field. But remember, the Ignition coil has TWO Coils. The Secondary winding, also, uses the magnetic field created, and collapsed, by the primary coil. The Secondary has 100x the amount of windings as the Primary, so the voltage created in the Secondary is 100x that of the primary. 400v x 100 = 40,000v.
As Ben pointed out, when we read Primary Voltage, Your Scope lead is physically touching the circuit, and is in direct contact with 400v. When we read secondary, we are reading a magnetic field created around the wire, the scope lead is not physically touching the circuit. Secondary Ignition probes convert the magnetic field into a LOW voltage that can be measured by the scope and translated to represent the HIGH voltage.
"Knowledge is a weapon. Arm yourself, well, before going to do battle."
"Understanding a question is half an answer."
I have learned more by being wrong, than I have by being right.
Last edit: 2 years 6 months ago by Chad.
The following user(s) said Thank You: juergen.scholl, Mitchroberson
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- juergen.scholl
- Offline
- Platinum Member
- Active partschanger
Less
More
- Posts: 1195
- Thank you received: 446
2 years 6 months ago - 2 years 6 months ago #51605
by juergen.scholl
An expert is someone who knows each time more on each time less, until he finally knows absolutely everything about absolutely nothing.
Replied by juergen.scholl on topic Re:Primary vs secondary ignition confusion
Ben, thank you....just one observation with regards to your good explanation: the "inductive wire clamps" actually are capacative probes, sensing changes in an electrical field as opposed to inductive sensors which react to changes in magnetic fields. The attachment deals with the differences between the 2 types. It might be informative as this seems to be a topic where confusion reigns to some extent.which is why we use cop paddles or inductive wire clamps
Sent from my SM-G781U using Tapatalk
An expert is someone who knows each time more on each time less, until he finally knows absolutely everything about absolutely nothing.
Last edit: 2 years 6 months ago by juergen.scholl.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Mitchroberson
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Mitchroberson
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Senior Member
Less
More
- Posts: 74
- Thank you received: 12
2 years 6 months ago #51662
by Mitchroberson
Replied by Mitchroberson on topic Re:Re:Primary vs secondary ignition confusion
Are there any good references or videos about using an attenuator with your scope? And when you should use one?
Sent from my SM-N970U using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-N970U using Tapatalk
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
2 years 6 months ago #51663
by Chad
"Knowledge is a weapon. Arm yourself, well, before going to do battle."
"Understanding a question is half an answer."
I have learned more by being wrong, than I have by being right.
Replied by Chad on topic Re:Re:Primary vs secondary ignition confusion
The most important thing to know is: What is the maximum amount of voltage that your scope is rated for? The 4-channel Pico automotive series can handle up to 200 volts. The Pico 8-channel, only 50 volts. Snap-on scopes can handle up to 400 volts, without attenutation.
The important thing, is to know your scope's limitation. Also, know what kind of voltage you expect to see during your testing. Injector voltage can reach up to 100 volts. An ignition coil can reach up to 400 volts. If you expect to exceed the limit of your scope, use an attenuator. Be sure to tell your scope that you are using an attenuator, or you will have to do the math, yourself. There should be a setting in the scope to tell it that you are using an attenuator. The scope will then multiply the signal by the same amount that the attenuator dropped it.
The important thing, is to know your scope's limitation. Also, know what kind of voltage you expect to see during your testing. Injector voltage can reach up to 100 volts. An ignition coil can reach up to 400 volts. If you expect to exceed the limit of your scope, use an attenuator. Be sure to tell your scope that you are using an attenuator, or you will have to do the math, yourself. There should be a setting in the scope to tell it that you are using an attenuator. The scope will then multiply the signal by the same amount that the attenuator dropped it.
"Knowledge is a weapon. Arm yourself, well, before going to do battle."
"Understanding a question is half an answer."
I have learned more by being wrong, than I have by being right.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Mitchroberson
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Mitchroberson
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Senior Member
Less
More
- Posts: 74
- Thank you received: 12
2 years 6 months ago #51666
by Mitchroberson
Replied by Mitchroberson on topic Re:Re:Re:Primary vs secondary ignition confusion
Thanks, I found one of the videos that explained this about 5 min ago. I am a diy guy. Was trained as a mechanic years ago. Bit my instructor never taught the sun scope. I wanted to learn it so bad. Recently bought a micsig. And already have a US open. Can't weight to do more testing
Sent from my SM-N970U using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-N970U using Tapatalk
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.221 seconds